BREAKING UPDATE: Judge Declares MISTRIAL After He Gets Into Argument with Clancy Defense Attorney Over One ‘Holdout’ (VIDEO) – EMERGENCY REQUEST FOR RELIEF DENIED!

**LIVE UPDATES — PLEASE REFRESH PAGE FOR UPDATES**

UPDATE: At 2:20 pm ET, the emergency request for relief was denied. The judge officially declared a mistrial!

The Clancy prosecution has already told the court they will be retrying the case.

BREAKING UPDATE: The judge declared a mistrial after the jurors could not come to a unanimous decision.

The judge gave Clancy’s defense team one hour to appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

The lawyer asked for emergency intervention!

Update: The Massachusetts Supreme Court granted a hearing for Lindsay Clancy’s defense team.

The Zoom hearing already took place. The Massachusetts Judicial Supreme Court will file a decision shortly.

Another day of drama in the Clancy courtroom!

Court reconvened on Friday morning in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial on day seven of deliberations after jurors told the judge all week that they could not come to a unanimous decision.

Lindsay Clancy strangled her three children to death in January 2023.

The young children, Cora (5), Callan (8 months), and Dawson (3), were found dead in the Clancy, Massachusetts, home’s basement.

The jury comprises 9 women and 3 men.

Lindsay Clancy admitted to killing her three children, however, her defense team is arguing she should not be found guilty by reason of insanity.

The defense teams argued that Lindsay Clancy was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis and heard voices commanding her to kill her children.

Prosecutors argued that Lindsay Clancy acted with deliberate premeditation and even sent her husband out on an errand while she murdered their kids.

The jury is considering five verdicts:

– Guilty of First-Degree Murder
– Guilty of Second-Degree Murder
– Guilty of Manslaughter
– Not Guilty
– Not Guilty due to Lack of Criminal Responsibility

On Thursday, Clancy’s defense team requested to remove one juror for not following the rules on reasonable doubt but Judge William Sullivan denied the motion.

The judge on Thursday gave the jury information on reasonable doubt and ordered them to resume deliberations.

Judge Sullivan admonished the jurors for refusing to listen to his instructions on reasonable doubt.

On Friday, Clancy’s defense attorney Kevin Reddington accused the one male ‘holdout’ of lying under oath, claiming the juror promised to follow the law and is refusing to apply the reasonable doubt standard.

The one lone male juror is holding the line.

In a stunning moment, Reddington also lashed out at the judge for not giving a more “forceful” instruction on proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

“What do you want me to do, get a brass band?” Judge Sullivan asked Reddington. “I read the instruction as written!”

“I’m not an actor! I’m just giving the instruction!” the judge shouted.

Attorney Kevin Reddington accused the judge of ‘glossing’ over the reasonable doubt issue.

The judge hit back.

“I am not glossing over the issue. I’ve thought about this issue long enough,” the judge said.

How is this attorney not being held in contempt?

WATCH:

Photo of author
Cristina began writing for The Gateway Pundit in 2016 and she is now the Associate Editor.

You can email Cristina Laila here, and read more of Cristina Laila's articles here.

Ad block users: Some site features may not work correctly while an ad blocker is enabled, because they break scripts and content this website depends on. If you can't see comments below, for example, please disable your ad blocker.

 

Dear Reader - The enemies of freedom are choking off the Gateway Pundit from the resources we need to bring you the truth. Since many asked for it, we now have a way for you to support The Gateway Pundit directly - and get ad-reduced access. Plus, there are goodies like a special Gateway Pundit coffee mug for supporters at a higher level. You can see all the options by clicking here - thank you for your support!
Thanks for sharing!