See if You Can Spot the Difference Between How the NY Times Covered Dr. Ben Carson vs. Abdul El-Sayed

The media is biased against conservatives. Pretty much everyone on the right knows this.

Even so, sometimes you see evidence of bias that is so over the top, that you really have to marvel at the media’s ability to carry it out with no shame.

Byron York is a writer for the Washington Examiner. He recently stumbled onto an example of media bias that will blow your mind.

Over at the New York Times, they’re covering the various races of the 2026 midterms. In their coverage of , they constantly refer to El-Sayed as a doctor, even though he isn’t one. El-Sayed has never seen a single patient and has never practiced medicine in any capacity, but they still call him a doctor.

Dr. Ben Carson is not only a doctor, he is a renowned pediatric brain surgeon. Yet the same newspaper, the New York Times, referred to Carson as ‘Mr.’ instead of doctor.

This is almost unbelievable.

Take a look below:

Here are some reactions:

And then the media wonders why people no longer trust them.

Amazing.

Photo of author
Mike LaChance has been covering higher education and politics for Legal Insurrection since 2012. Since 2008 he has contributed work to the Gateway Pundit, Daily Caller, Breitbart, the Center for Security Policy, the Washington Free Beacon, and Ricochet. He has also written for American Lookout, Townhall, and Twitchy.

You can email Mike LaChance here, and read more of Mike LaChance's articles here.

Ad block users: Some site features may not work correctly while an ad blocker is enabled, because they break scripts and content this website depends on. If you can't see comments below, for example, please disable your ad blocker.

 

Thanks for sharing!